ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Management of Iatrogenic Bile-Duct Injury After Cholecystectomy, 1995-2025: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI) constitutes a major complication of cholecystectomy. The optimal timing, method, and setting for definitive repair remain subjects of debate. This study aimed to systematically evaluate management strategies, timing of repair, and prognostic factors influencing postoperative outcomes following IBDI. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines (PROSPERO CRD420251003227). PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched through March 2025. Eligible randomized trials and cohort studies reporting management outcomes were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently. Pooled analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Twenty-eight studies (2 randomized trials, 24 cohort studies, 2 systematic reviews) involving >18,000 patients were analyzed. Surgical repair achieved higher success than endoscopic therapy (92.6% vs. 76.1%; RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.35) and reduced stricture risk (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15-0.38). Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy provided durable outcomes (success 83.5%; stricture 8.9%). Early (<2 weeks) or delayed (>6 weeks) repair after sepsis control was associated with lower morbidity (9-11%) compared with intermediate repair (2-6 weeks). Referral to hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) centers reduced complications (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23-0.46). Overall morbidity and mortality were 22.7% and 2.9%. Outcomes following IBDI are determined primarily by surgical expertise and patient stability rather than timing alone. In optimized patients, both early and delayed reconstruction are safe and effective, whereas intermediate repair and non-specialist interventions increase risk. Timely referral to HPB centers should be considered standard practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.