ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Intracavernosal Botulinum Toxin Injection for Erectile Dysfunction: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundErectile dysfunction (ED) affects approximately 20% of men worldwide, significantly affecting their quality of life. While phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) are the standard first-line treatment, a substantial number of patients are non-responders. Second-line treatments, such as intracavernosal alprostadil, are effective but often limited by their invasive nature and the need for frequent injections. Intracavernosal onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) offers a promising new option. By inhibiting acetylcholine release and norepinephrine, as well as other neurotransmitters involved in detumescence, it facilitates cavernosal smooth muscle relaxation and enhances penile blood flow. Its effects may persist for up to six months following a single injection, potentially reducing treatment burden and improving adherence among men with refractory ED.
methodsA systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception until August 2025 using a combination of keywords and MeSH terms related to 'erectile dysfunction' and 'botulinum toxin'. After screening, 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to significant heterogeneity in interventions (e.g., BoNT-A dosage, co-therapies), patient populations, and reported outcomes, the data were not suitable for meta-analysis. Consequently, a narrative synthesis was performed to summarize the findings.
resultsAmong the included studies, intracavernosal BoNT-A was associated with improvements in validated erectile function scores. Reported response rates, variably defined across studies, ranged from 40% to 77.5%. Several studies suggested that efficacy was higher in patients with mild-to-moderate ED and with repeated administration of 100 U doses. The treatment exhibited a favorable safety profile. The most common adverse event was mild, transient penile pain (reported incidence 1.5-6%). No studies reported serious systemic adverse events. The overall strength of the evidence was limited by significant heterogeneity among the included studies and their generally small sample sizes.
conclusionsBased on this systematic review, intracavernosal onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) may be a beneficial therapeutic option for patients with refractory ED, offering potential improvements in sexual function while reducing the need for invasive therapies. Future large-scale, placebo-controlled studies are essential to confirm these benefits and standardize their clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.