Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41465711›Full record

ArticleInsects2025

From Values to Action: An Integrative Explanatory Framework for Insect Conservation Intentions and Behavior.

Geanina Magdalena Sitar, Ivana Ostřanská Spitzer, Lukas Spitzer, Claudia Marian, Iulia Francesca Pop, Cristian Sitar, Alina Simona Rusu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geanina Magdalena SitarDoctoral School "Education, Reflection, Development", Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University, 7 Sindicatelor Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5373-6738
Ivana Ostřanská SpitzerMuseum of the Moravian Wallachia Region, Horní náměstí 2, 755 01 Vsetín, Czech Republic.
Lukas SpitzerMuseum of the Moravian Wallachia Region, Horní náměstí 2, 755 01 Vsetín, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6323-0669
Claudia MarianSpecialized Department with a Psychopedagogical Profile, Technical University of Cluj Napoca-North University Center of Baia Mare, Victoriei Street, 76, 430113 Baia Mare, Romania.
Iulia Francesca PopDepartment of Fundamental Sciences, Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 3-5 Calea Mănăştur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cristian SitarZoological Museum, Babes-Bolyai University, 5-7 Clinicilor, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6643-8633
Alina Simona RusuDoctoral School "Education, Reflection, Development", Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University, 7 Sindicatelor Street, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9554-4139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects constitute a vital component of terrestrial ecosystems, yet their ongoing global decline underscores the urgency of identifying the factors that facilitate or hinder public engagement in their conservation. This study identifies the key psychological drivers of insect-related conservation behavior within a Romanian context, an understudied geographical and sociocultural setting. Using data collected from 346 adult respondents via an online questionnaire, the predictive performance of the Value-Belief-Norm (VBN) theory, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and an integrated VBN-TPB framework was examined through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The VBN model exhibited superior explanatory power relative to TPB, with biospheric values, ecological worldviews, and personal moral norms emerging as the most influential determinants of behavioral intention and self-reported action. Although participants demonstrated moderate levels of general entomological knowledge, awareness of specific insect-friendly practices was notably limited and frequently characterized by misconceptions. Perceived barriers, particularly informational deficits, time constraints, and financial considerations, exerted significant inhibitory effects on conservation engagement. The findings indicate that effective interventions must extend beyond knowledge transmission, incorporating strategies that activate moral norms, strengthen affective and identity-based motivations, and reduce structural barriers to action.

Indexed as

attitudes towards insectshuman–insect relationshipsinsect conservation behaviorTheory of Planned BehaviorValue–Belief–Norm Theory

Identifiers

PMID41465711
PMCPMC12733544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.