Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41465706›Full record

ArticleInsects2025

Ecological Network Theory Boosts Land Maxing Benefits for Biodiversity: An Example with Tropical Bee-Plant Interactions.

Valerie E Peters, Elijah Cruz Cardona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Editorial for theInsects · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Valerie E PetersDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, 521 Lancaster Ave, Richmond, KY 40475, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0337-2577
Elijah Cruz CardonaDepartment of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA.

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation DEB-2142938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land maxing in cultivated ecosystems can improve upon other agroecological approaches because in this approach social, economic and ecological benefits are maximized within the available land, in part through the careful selection of plant species with specific benefits, e.g., biodiversity conservation, provision of ecological services, diversifying and improving farmer incomes. In this approach, plant species selected for improving farmer incomes are those providing non-timber marketable products, and plant species selected for biodiversity conservation and provision of ecological services can be identified quantitatively via ecological network theory. Here, we demonstrate using ecological network theory to identify (a) farm management practices associated with ecological network indices, and (b) key plant species that farmers can plant to maximize the potential for their land to support bees and pollination services. In this study we quantified bee-plant interaction networks within 10 agroforests, and compared results between the entire bee community and the subsetted stingless bee community. Bee abundance increased with flowering plant richness, explaining 9% of the variance (R

Indexed as

agroforestrycentrality indexmodel selectionmodularitypollination services

Identifiers

PMID41465706
PMCPMC12733541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.