ArticleInsects2025
Cross-Modal and Contrastive Optimization for Explainable Multimodal Recognition of Predatory and Parasitic Insects.
Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural enemies play a vital role in pest suppression and ecological balance within agricultural ecosystems. However, conventional vision-based recognition methods are highly susceptible to illumination variation, occlusion, and background noise in complex field environments, making it difficult to accurately distinguish morphologically similar species. To address these challenges, a multimodal natural enemy recognition and ecological interpretation framework, termed MAVC-XAI, is proposed to enhance recognition accuracy and ecological interpretability in real-world agricultural scenarios. The framework employs a dual-branch spatiotemporal feature extraction network for deep modeling of both visual and acoustic signals, introduces a cross-modal sampling attention mechanism for dynamic inter-modality alignment, and incorporates cross-species contrastive learning to optimize inter-class feature boundaries. Additionally, an explainable generation module is designed to provide ecological visualizations of the model's decision-making process in both visual and acoustic domains. Experiments conducted on multimodal datasets collected across multiple agricultural regions confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The MAVC-XAI framework achieves an accuracy of 0.938, a precision of 0.932, a recall of 0.927, an F1-score of 0.929, an mAP@50 of 0.872, and a Top-5 recognition rate of 97.8%, all significantly surpassing unimodal models such as ResNet, Swin-T, and VGGish, as well as multimodal baselines including MMBT and ViLT. Ablation experiments further validate the critical contributions of the cross-modal sampling attention and contrastive learning modules to performance enhancement. The proposed framework not only enables high-precision natural enemy identification under complex ecological conditions but also provides an interpretable and intelligent foundation for AI-driven ecological pest management and food security monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.