ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Clinical Insights into Mesenchymal Stem Cell Applications for Spinal Cord Injury.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Cerebellar Ataxia: From Bench to Bedside.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Transcriptomics Insights into Spinal Cord Injury for Therapy Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells in orthopaedics and traumatology in daily practice.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review examines the safety and clinical efficacy of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs)-based therapies in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The analysis covers 26 clinical studies conducted on patients with varying degrees of the post-SCI neurological deficit. The review highlights the methodology of trials, the source of MSCs, the dosage of cells administered, transplantation methods, patient inclusion criteria, and the methods of evaluating the effectiveness of the therapy. MSC transplantation in SCI was safe and feasible in all the studies summarized in our review. All studies conducted have demonstrated varying degrees of patient improvement and reduction in the severity of neurological deficits. However, further controlled randomized studies on larger numbers of patients are needed to better evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of MS transplantation. The prospects of the enhancement of the efficacy of the SCI cell therapy with MSCs, including their transplantation with other types of stem cells, administration of MSC-derived exosomes, genetic modification of MSCs, use of the MSC- and other-stem-cell-based tissue-engineered scaffolds, and combination of cell therapy with neuromodulation, are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.