Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41465565›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.

Elena Mikhaylova, Emil Khusnutdinov, Mikhail Terekhov, Daniil Pozdeev, Oleg Gusev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elena MikhaylovaInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7374-8405
Emil KhusnutdinovInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6626-3928
Mikhail TerekhovInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-5278-6609
Daniil PozdeevInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-5981-9389
Oleg GusevInstitute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6203-9758

Funding

The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation 075-15-2025-014 (075-15-2024-666)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remaining problems in pig farming may no longer be solved with traditional methods. The search for genetic variants associated with desired characteristics and involvement of animals with superior genetics in breeding programs is rarely effective for polygenic traits and pleiotropic genes. The lack of diversity in the germplasm also limits the use of breeding, but some beneficial mutations that did not occur naturally can be introduced manually via genome editing methods. Mutations discovered in other species, such as cattle, can be reproduced in pigs. Traits that were previously pursued for centuries might be achieved by genome editing in a few years. Enormous progress has been made in producing pigs resistant to viruses and in increasing meat productivity and quality. But there are still pressing problems such as lameness and damaging behaviors that probably cannot be solved without genome editing techniques. Their wider application is complicated by the requirement for large amounts of biomaterial, surgical manipulations and cell culture, as well as by the shift towards biomedical research. This review concentrates on the main achievements and challenges in pig agricultural genetics that can be addressed by genome editing.

Indexed as

AgricultureGene EditingGenomeAnimalsBreedingCRISPR-Cas SystemsSwineCRISPR/Casknock-inknockoutmeat productivitymeat qualitypig genomicsRNPSCNTTALENvirus resistanceZFN

Identifiers

PMID41465565
PMCPMC12733480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.