Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41465528›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Ploidy and Implantation Potential: Non-Invasive Small Non-Coding RNA-Based Health Assessment of Day 5 and 6 Blastocysts.

Angelika V Timofeeva, Ivan S Fedorov, Guzel V Savostina, Alla M Tarasova, Svetlana G Perminova, Tatyana A Nazarenko, Gennady T Sukhikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angelika V TimofeevaNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician Kulakov V.I., 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2324-9653
Ivan S FedorovNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician Kulakov V.I., 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2104-5887
Guzel V SavostinaNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician Kulakov V.I., 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Alla M TarasovaNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician Kulakov V.I., 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Svetlana G PerminovaNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician Kulakov V.I., 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana A NazarenkoNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician Kulakov V.I., 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Gennady T SukhikhNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician Kulakov V.I., 117997 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Ministry of Health 125022002648-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A predominant etiological factor in implantation failure and early pregnancy loss is embryonic chromosomal abnormalities. The current clinical standard for determining embryonic ploidy is invasive preimplantation genetic testing. This procedure imposes mechanical stress on embryonic cells during trophectoderm biopsy and fails to significantly improve live birth rates per transfer, likely due to its inability to evaluate the embryo's implantation potential. Consequently, there is a clear need to develop a non-invasive method, suitable for routine clinical practice, that can simultaneously assess both the ploidy and implantation competence of a blastocyst prior to uterine transfer. Our research group was the first to achieve this by quantifying specific piwiRNAs (piR_016677, piR_017716, piR_020497, piR_015462) in spent culture medium. These data served as the foundation for logistic regression models tailored for day 5 blastocysts, day 6 blastocysts, and blastocysts irrespective of their developmental rate. These models demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with specificity ranging from 68% to 100% and sensitivity from 71% to 100%. The rationale for employing these molecules as biomarkers lies in their potential biological roles, which encompass maintaining genomic stability through

Indexed as

BlastocystEmbryo ImplantationPloidiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPreimplantation Diagnosisaneuploidyassisted reproductive technologiesblastocystculture mediumeuploidyimplantation potentiallogistic regression modelpiwiRNAreal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID41465528
PMCPMC12733470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.