Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41465327›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

The Current Landscape of Modular CAR T Cells.

Alexander Haide Joechner, Melanie Mach, Ziduo Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engineering the next generation of cellular therapies for solid tumors: multi-specific armored CARs and TME reprogramming strategies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. In Vivo CAR-T Therapies-A New Era of Programmable Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander Haide JoechnerBiosceptre (Aust) Pty Ltd., Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-7039-5382
Melanie MachBiosceptre (Aust) Pty Ltd., Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8584-8104
Ziduo LiBiosceptre (Aust) Pty Ltd., Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-3358-3524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the groundbreaking impact of currently approved CAR T-cell therapies, substantial unmet clinical needs remain. This highlights the need for CAR T treatments that are easier to tune, combine, and program with logic rules, in oncology and autoimmunity. Modular CAR T cells use a two-part system: the CAR on the T cell binds an adaptor molecule (AM), and that adaptor binds the tumour-associated antigen (TAA). This design separates recognition of the target antigen and activation of the T cells, resulting in a cellular therapy concept with better control, flexibility, and safety compared to established direct-targeting CAR T-cell systems. The key advantage of the system is the adaptor molecule, often an antibody-based reagent, that targets the TAA. Adaptors can be swapped or combined without re-engineering the T cells, enabling straightforward multiplexing and logic-gated control. The CAR itself is designed to recognise the AM via a unique tag on the adaptor. Only when the CAR, AM, and antigen-positive target cell assemble correctly is T-cell effector function activated, leading to cancer cell lysis. This two-component system has several features that need to be considered when designing a modular CAR: First, the architecture of the CAR, i.e., how the binding domain and the backbone are designed, can influence tonic signalling and activation/exhaustion parameters. Second, the affinity of CAR-AM and AM-TAA will mostly define the engagement kinetics of the system. Third, the valency of the AM has an impact on exhaustion and non-specific activation of CAR T cells. And lastly, the architecture of the AM, especially the size, defines the pharmacokinetics and, consequently, the dosing scheme of the AM. The research conducted on direct-targeting CAR T cells have generated in-depth knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of the technology in its current form, with remarkable clinical success in relapsed/refractory disease and long-term survival in otherwise difficult-to-treat patient populations. On the other hand, CAR T-cell therapy poses the risk of severe adverse events and antigen loss coupled with antigen-negative relapse which remains the main reason for failed therapies. Addressing these issues in the traditional setting of one CAR targeting one antigen will always be difficult due to the heterogeneous nature of most oncologic diseases, but the flexibility to change target antigens and the modulation of CAR T response by dosing the AM in a modular CAR system might be pivotal to mitigate these hurdles of direct CAR T cells. Since the first conception of modular CARs in 2012, there have been more than 30 constructs published, and some of those have been translated into phase I/II clinical trials with early signs of success, but whether these will progress into a late-stage clinical trial and gain regulatory approval remains to be seen.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigenadaptor CARadaptor molecule (AM)antigen receptorCAR T cellindirect CARmodular CARswitchable CAR

Identifiers

PMID41465327
PMCPMC12733020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.