ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Plant MicroRNA Research: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant microRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous non-coding RNAs (~20-24 nucleotides) that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally, playing critical roles in plant growth, development, and stress responses. This review systematically examines AI applications in plant miRNA research, tracing evolution from traditional machine learning to deep learning architectures. Plant miRNAs exhibit distinctive features necessitating plant-specific computational approaches: nuclear-localized biogenesis, high target complementarity (>80%), and coding region targeting. These characteristics enable more accurate computational prediction and experimental validation than animal systems. Methodological advances have improved prediction accuracy from ~90% (early SVMs) to >99% (recent deep learning), though metrics reflect different evaluation contexts. We analyze applications across miRNA identification, target prediction with degradome validation, miRNA-lncRNA interactions, and ceRNA networks. Critical assessment reveals that degradome data capture mixed RNA fragments from multiple sources beyond miRNA cleavage, requiring stringent multi-evidence validation. Similarly, fundamental ambiguities in lncRNA definition compound prediction uncertainties. Major challenges include severe data imbalance (positive to negative ratios of 1:100 to 1:10,000), limited cross-species generalization, insufficient model interpretability, and experimental validation bottlenecks. Approximately 75% of plant miRNA families in miRBase v20 lack convincing evidence, underscoring the need for rigorous annotation standards. Future directions encompass multimodal deep learning, explainable AI, spatiotemporal graph neural networks, and ultimately AI-driven de novo miRNA design, though the latter requires substantial advances in both computation and high-throughput validation. This synthesis demonstrates that AI has become indispensable for plant miRNA research, providing essential support for crop improvement while acknowledging persistent challenges demanding continued innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.