ArticleGenes2025
Secondary Ophthalmic Features Represent Diagnostic Clues and Potential Points of Intervention for Inherited Retinal Diseases (Target 5000 Report 3).
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveInherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are the leading cause of blind registration in children and adults, yet 30-40% of cases remain genetically unresolved. Deep ophthalmic phenotyping may help to address this shortfall by identifying characteristic phenotypes. We describe the ophthalmic features of patients with stationary or progressive inherited retinal diseases other than outer retinal degeneration (i.e., secondary ophthalmic features, SOFs).
methodsThis is a retrospective review of all patients attending an ophthalmic genetics clinic with a genetically confirmed IRD focusing on SOFs including refractive error, cataract, retinal detachment (RRD), cystoid macular lesions (CML) and epiretinal membrane (ERM). These features were assessed in the context of phenotype and genotype.
resultsIn a cohort of 429 genotyped patients, ≥1 SOFs were seen in 70.2% of patients, with 36.6% being affected by multiple SOFs. Refractive error (63.3%) and cataract (43.4%) were the most common secondary features, with a subset affected by CML (14.7%), ERM (10%) and RRD (4.7%).
conclusionsSOFs are common in patients with IRDs and most are amenable to therapeutic intervention even when no primary treatment (e.g., gene therapy) is available. We highlight patterns associated with genotypes and disease groups which may aid harmonisation of clinical and genetic diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.