ArticleGenes2025
Heat Shock Protein 104 (
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsThe marine diatom
methodsIn the present study, we determined the full-length sequence of
resultsThe open reading frame (ORF) was 2745 bp in length, encoding a protein of 915 amino acids (101.15 kDa). Phylogenetic and domain structural analysis revealed that DbHsp104 possesses conserved features of eukaryotic Hsp104. In addition, transcriptional responses of the gene were evaluated after exposures to thermal stress at 20, 25, and 30 °C, and heavy metals and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) for 24 h. Relative gene expression analysis showed that
conclusionsThese results suggest that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.