ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Aligning Alternative Proteins with Consumer Values in Germany: A Values-Centric Communication Framework.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transition to sustainable food systems requires communication strategies that resonate with consumers' values, not only technological innovation. This study examines how values-centric communication can shape German consumers' responses to alternative proteins, focusing on insect-based snacks. A desk-based synthesis of recent studies, guided by Schwartz's value theory, identified Tradition and Security as dominant drivers of food choice and yielded five communication requirements: Cultural familiarity, Emotional safety, Simplicity and clarity, Trust and credibility, and Routine integration. These were operationalised into communication guidelines and short on-pack claims, which were applied to a refined packaging prototype. An exploratory focus group (N = 7) then compared reactions to the original versus the refined packaging, analysed using McGuire's communication-persuasion stages. Within this small exploratory group, participants reported that familiar formats, a reassuring tone, clear visual hierarchy, and salient trust cues made them more willing to consider trying the product, whereas information overload, claim-image incongruence, value-incongruent brand naming, and delayed recognition of insect content appeared to impede acceptance. The study contributes an integrative analytic lens combining Schwartz's value theory with McGuire's model and a set of testable guidelines for value-aligned food communication. Because the empirical evidence is based on a single small student focus group with fixed presentation order, bundled manipulations, and hypothetical intentions, these results are exploratory and self-reported and should be interpreted cautiously; future research should employ counterbalanced factorial designs with behavioural outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.