ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Adoption of 3D-Printed Food in Romania: Price Perception as a Key Determinant of Consumer Acceptance.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional printed food has rapidly positioned itself at the intersection of food technology and personalized nutrition, opening up new perspectives for sustainable production, creative customization, and more efficient resource use. Although global interest in this innovation continues to grow, consumer acceptance remains largely underexplored in Central and Eastern Europe. This study analyzes how Romanian consumers approach the adoption of 3D-printed food by applying an extended UTAUT2 framework to a sample of 608 urban respondents. Using structural equation modeling, it examines the influence of expected effort, performance expectancy, social influence, and perceived compatibility on adoption intention, while price perception is introduced as a key mediating variable-a novel and meaningful contribution to the literature on food technology acceptance. Given the non-probabilistic sampling design, the difficulties encountered in measuring Hedonic Motivation and Facilitating Conditions, and the early diffusion stage of 3D food printing in Romania, the present work should be viewed as a robust exploratory investigation based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) among urban Romanian consumers, providing first empirical evidence on 3D-printed food acceptance in Eastern Europe rather than definitive conclusions for the entire population. The results highlight that utilitarian and social factors are decisive: expected effort enhances perceived performance, while performance, social influence, and compatibility significantly strengthen perceptions of price fairness. In turn, price perception strongly predicts consumers' behavioral intention to adopt 3D-printed food. Hedonic motivation and facilitating conditions were not statistically significant and were therefore removed from the final model. These findings show that, in emerging food markets, consumers tend to make adoption decisions based more on rational value assessments than on novelty or convenience. The study contributes to theory by embedding price perception into the UTAUT2 framework and to practice by identifying the key elements that can boost market readiness-transparent pricing and closer alignment with consumer values. By filling an important gap in the empirical literature from Eastern Europe and focusing on price as a cognitive bridge between technological and psychological drivers, this paper offers a timely and relevant contribution to ongoing research on consumer perception and acceptance of food innovations. For Eastern European food innovation research, this study provides one of the first quantitative analyses of 3D-printed food acceptance that explicitly links technology-related beliefs to price perception in a regional, price-sensitive context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.