ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Differences in Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Between Pregnancies Following Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF): A Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancies following Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) are associated with increased risk for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, it is not clear if these associations are derived from infertility or fertility treatment itself. The goal of this review is to investigate if there are differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes between pregnancies conceived through either intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) to obtain an estimate of the effect of the fertility treatment. We retrospectively reviewed the literature for original studies comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies following IUI to those following IVF. To reduce confounding, our synthesis focuses on singleton gestations, while excluding donor sperm and multifetal pregnancies. Findings are interpreted alongside recent ART vs. non-ART evidence to contextualize potential treatment-related effects. Most studies suggest no difference in maternal outcomes, but outcomes were inconsistently reported between studies. Neonatal outcomes were more consistently reported, and there was less variation between results. Current evidence does not suggest a large difference in neonatal outcomes between IVF and IUI. However, almost all studies have significant limitations that hinder clear conclusions. To summarize, even though the current literature does not suggest significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes following IVF and IUI, further high-quality studies are needed to establish a definite correlation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.