ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) of Upper Gastrointestinal Carcinomas: An Integrated Clinical and Pathological Perspective.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has revolutionized the management of early upper gastrointestinal (GI) carcinomas. While technically demanding, it offers, in experienced hands, definitive local therapy for early GI neoplasia by allowing complete En bloc resection of mucosal and superficially invasive neoplasms, thus enabling precise histopathological risk stratification and organ preservation. Appropriate patient selection relies on meticulous endoscopic assessment using high-definition and image-enhanced endoscopy to define lesion boundaries and predict invasion depth. The principal indications include high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early carcinomas without endoscopic evidence of deep submucosal invasion or lymph node metastasis risk factors. Pathological analysis of the resection specimens includes histological typing and grading per WHO classification and precise assessment of invasion depth-in case of submucosal invasion measurement in micrometers-and evaluation of margin status and lymphovascular invasion. The presence of risk factors such as deep invasion in the submucosa, poor differentiation, or lymphovascular invasion may require additional surgery, guided by validated risk scores such as the eCura system. This narrative review summarizes current clinical and pathological practices for ESD in upper GI lesions. This includes the discussion of technical and biological challenges and the need of accurate assessment of risk factors for systemic metastatic spread and local recurrence as a limitation for this sophisticated but highly effective therapeutic method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.