Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41464716›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Dry Anophthalmic Socket Syndrome-A Narrative Review.

Daniele Lorenzano, Alberto Chierigo, Alessandra Claudia Modugno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniele LorenzanoOculoplastic and Orbital Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Alberto ChierigoOculoplastic and Orbital Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Alessandra Claudia ModugnoOcularistica Italiana, 00192 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry Anophthalmic Socket Syndrome (DASS) is a multifactorial condition that affects roughly half of all prosthetic eye wearers and remains frequently underrecognized. It is characterised by symptoms such as dryness, discomfort, discharge, and inflammation of the socket surface. Diagnostic criteria include validated symptom questionnaires (e.g., OSDI, DEQ-5, SANDE) and at least one clinical sign such as conjunctival staining, blepharitis, or reduced tear meniscus height. This review describes the anatomical, cellular, and molecular changes associated with DASS. Meibomian gland dysfunction is common, with a significant reduction in gland density and structure. Goblet cell density is also often decreased, particularly in the tarsal and bulbar conjunctiva, although findings may be affected by topical treatments. Increased conjunctival inflammation-evidenced by immune cell infiltration and elevated markers such as MMP-9 and ICAM-1-is frequently observed, particularly in the posterior socket lining. Oxidative stress, mediated by dysregulated NOX4, KEAP1, and NRF2 expression, appears to play a contributory role. Additional factors influencing DASS include eyelid malpositions such as entropion and ectropion, prosthesis smoothness and amount of tear film production. Poor hygiene practices and environmental factors may exacerbate symptoms. Given its multifactorial aetiology, DASS requires a complex management strategy targeting inflammation, tear film instability, mechanical irritation, eyelid position and patient education. Increased awareness, standardised diagnostics, and evidence-based care protocols are critical to improving outcomes for prosthetic eye wearers.

Indexed as

anophthalmic socketDASSdry anophthalmic socketdry anophthalmic socket syndromedry socket

Identifiers

PMID41464716
PMCPMC12734268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.