Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41464507›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Young Australian Women's Views on Peer Support for Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study.

Amy Wang, Demee Rheinberger, Samantha Tang, Helen Christensen, Alison L Calear, Katherine Boydell, Alexis Whitton, Aimy Slade, Anastasia Hronis

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amy WangDiscipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4338-3801
Demee RheinbergerBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4493-8565
Samantha TangBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-2065
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7028-725X
Katherine BoydellBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1464-8532
Alexis WhittonBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7944-2172
Aimy SladeBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5368-1792
Anastasia HronisDiscipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF), Australia 1200195NHMRC Fellowships 1155614NHMRC Fellowships 1173146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-harm among young women has been rising internationally and in Australia, yet many are not in contact with formal services. Peer support may play an important role in managing self-harm; however, it remains under-investigated. This qualitative study explored how young Australian women perceive peer support for managing self-harm. Using purposive sampling, twenty-seven women (

Indexed as

Peer GroupSelf-Injurious BehaviorSocial SupportAdolescentAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchYoung Adultintentional self-harmnon-suicidal self-injurypeer supportself-harmself-harm recoveryself-injurious behaviour

Identifiers

PMID41464507
PMCPMC12732483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.