ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Sesotho Women's Preferences for Male Partner Involvement During Antenatal Care and Delivery.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Male partner involvement (MPI) is recognised as an important strategy for improving maternal health, yet little is known about women's preferences for how men should participate in antenatal care (ANC) and childbirth. This study explored Sesotho-speaking women's preferences for MPI and identified the forms of involvement that they considered to be appropriate and beneficial using a concurrent mixed-methods design. A survey was conducted with 513 women who had children under six years, and eight focus group discussions were held with 64 women of reproductive age. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and binomial logistic linear regression, while qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Survey findings revealed that 95.7% of women supported male attendance at ANC visits, while 78% favoured male presence during delivery. Support for MPI during delivery was associated with prior male attendance at ANC and previous birth, as well as older maternal age. Qualitative findings highlighted that women valued emotional and practical support and appreciated men's improved knowledge about pregnancy and childbirth. However, some women expressed concerns about privacy, cultural expectations, male anxiety, and potential verbal abuse. The combined findings reveal the complexity of women's perspectives on MPI, underscoring the importance of context-sensitive interventions that prioritise women's voices while promoting constructive male engagement in maternal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.