Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41464500›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Sesotho Women's Preferences for Male Partner Involvement During Antenatal Care and Delivery.

Michelle Engelbrecht, Ngwi Mulu, Gladys Kigozi-Male

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle EngelbrechtCentre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3970-0552
Ngwi MuluCentre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3129-3577
Gladys Kigozi-MaleCentre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7073-6561

Funding

National Research Foundation 141980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male partner involvement (MPI) is recognised as an important strategy for improving maternal health, yet little is known about women's preferences for how men should participate in antenatal care (ANC) and childbirth. This study explored Sesotho-speaking women's preferences for MPI and identified the forms of involvement that they considered to be appropriate and beneficial using a concurrent mixed-methods design. A survey was conducted with 513 women who had children under six years, and eight focus group discussions were held with 64 women of reproductive age. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and binomial logistic linear regression, while qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Survey findings revealed that 95.7% of women supported male attendance at ANC visits, while 78% favoured male presence during delivery. Support for MPI during delivery was associated with prior male attendance at ANC and previous birth, as well as older maternal age. Qualitative findings highlighted that women valued emotional and practical support and appreciated men's improved knowledge about pregnancy and childbirth. However, some women expressed concerns about privacy, cultural expectations, male anxiety, and potential verbal abuse. The combined findings reveal the complexity of women's perspectives on MPI, underscoring the importance of context-sensitive interventions that prioritise women's voices while promoting constructive male engagement in maternal health.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePregnancyYoung Adultantenatal caredeliverymale partner involvementmaternal health

Identifiers

PMID41464500
PMCPMC12733270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.