ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Theory-Based Antecedents of Stopping Texting While Driving Among College Students for Injury Prevention: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Texting while driving (TWD) is a leading cause of distracted driving-related crashes, especially among college students. This study applied the Multi-Theory Model (MTM) of health behavior change to predict initiation and sustenance of refraining from TWD among university students. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 164 students from a Southwestern U.S. public university using a 49-item validated MTM-based questionnaire. Structural equation modeling and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were employed to assess reliability, construct validity, and predictors of behavioral initiation and sustenance. Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.71 to 0.93, indicating strong reliability. The MTM demonstrated good fit (CFI = 0.950, RMSEA = 0.057 for initiation; CFI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.039 for sustenance). Behavioral confidence (β = 0.30,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.