Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41464456›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Household Clustering of High-Risk Contacts in Smear-Positive TB Patient Families: Evidence for Hotspot Households and Risk Stratification in Rural Eastern Cape.

Hloniphani Guma, Ntandazo Dlatu, Wezile Wilson Chitha, Teke Apalata, Lindiwe Modest Faye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hloniphani GumaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5099, South Africa.
Ntandazo DlatuWalter Sisulu Institute for Clinical Governance, Healthcare Administration, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5099, South Africa.
Wezile Wilson ChithaWalter Sisulu Institute for Clinical Governance, Healthcare Administration, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5099, South Africa.
Teke ApalataDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5099, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1329-3864
Lindiwe Modest FayeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5099, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7308-4239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousehold contacts of smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) patients face an elevated risk of infection and disease progression, particularly young children and individuals living in overcrowded households. Despite WHO recommendations for systematic contact screening and provision of TB preventive therapy (TPT), implementation remains suboptimal in high-burden rural areas. This study aimed to develop a practical framework for identifying and prioritizing high-risk families by examining demographic predictors, household clustering, and machine learning-based risk models.

methodsA total of 437 household contacts linked to smear-positive index cases were assessed and classified as high or low risk. Statistical analyses included descriptive measures, χ

resultsOf the 437 contacts, 290 (66.4%) were classified as high risk. A younger age was strongly associated with high-risk status (χ

conclusionsTB risk is highly clustered at the household level, with large families and young children carrying disproportionate vulnerability. Combining demographic risk assessment, household-level visualization, and predictive modeling provides a practical, data-driven approach to prioritizing households during contact investigation. These findings support the WHO's family-centered strategy and underscore the need to strengthen clinical governance and community-engaged education to optimize TB prevention in resource-limited rural settings.

Indexed as

Contact TracingFamily CharacteristicsTuberculosisAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMachine LearningMaleMiddle Agedclinical governancecommunity-engaged educationcontact investigationhigh-risk familieshousehold contactsmachine learningrisk stratificationtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID41464456
PMCPMC12732790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.