ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Extending the COSS Model to Youth Mental Health: Outcomes and Learnings from the Albury Project Mental Health Pilot.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents key findings and learnings from the Albury Project Mental Health Pilot, a six-month exploratory opportunity designed to extend the Community of Schools and Services (COSS) Model to proactively identify and support young people experiencing psychological distress in a regional Australian community. Working within the established COSS Model architecture and using population-level screening via the Australian Index of Adolescent Development (AIAD) survey, the pilot focused on a previously unreached and unsupported cohort of young people with high or very high scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) who were not engaged with existing mental health services. The support involved brief, tiered interventions tailored to individual needs. Short-term outcomes demonstrated improvements in K10 scores for the majority of participants, with many moving out of the K10 at-risk range. Medium-term data further showed sustained improvements in psychological distress and personal wellbeing for a substantial proportion of the cohort. The pilot identified a 'hidden cohort' and demonstrated that low-resource, brief interventions are capable of achieving high-impact outcomes within the existing COSS Model collective impact framework. While short-term, these findings suggest the COSS Model's adaptability and promise as a cost-efficient early intervention platform for youth mental health in broader community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.