ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Strategies to Facilitate Interorganizational Collaboration in County-Level Opioid Overdose Prevention and Response: A Qualitative Analysis.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-level overdose prevention interventions often require collaboration among organizations from various sectors including emergency medicine, criminal justice, harm reduction, and drug treatment organizations, yet little is known about ways to foster interorganizational collaboration among organizations with very different missions and in different socio-political contexts. This paper presents results from interviews with key informants involved in overdose prevention coalitions in two counties in Wisconsin (n = 45). Key informants were purposively selected from 31 different organizations in sectors including harm reduction, drug treatment, emergency medicine, and law enforcement. Interviews asked participants to describe the overdose crisis in their communities and the work they do, including any partnerships or coalitions formed with other organizations. We conducted thematic analysis using inductive and deductive coding. Participants' experiences illuminate strategies and actions that facilitated coalitions' work (interorganizational processes) and changed the context in which they worked to be more accepting of harm reduction efforts and less stigmatizing and punitive toward people who use opioids (PWUO). These included getting the word out in community-facing events to educate the public and destigmatize harm reduction, working with representatives across the CoC in various sectors, and actively working with them to create shared missions. Key people acted as bridges while others had the power to convene multiple agencies to a common cause. Overdose Fatality Reviews (OFRs) were found to be particularly helpful in identifying gaps in the current Opioid CoC and developing programs in collaboration with other organizations to address them. Organizational empowerment offers a useful framework for understanding how to facilitate IOC at the intra- (e.g., community education to reduce stigma, inter- (bridging roles by key actors), and extra-organizational levels (e.g., policy changes supporting naloxone access). These strategies can be used by coalition members and tested in future community-level overdose responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.