ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Effectiveness of Currently Recommended Questionnaires in Identifying Scoliosis Among Chronic Back Pain Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are pain intensity measures interchangeable? agreement among ODI, SRS-22, and COMI in chronic low back pain with and without scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesLow back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition, significantly impacting quality of life and incurring high social costs. Although non-specific (without anatomical abnormalities) LBP accounts for nearly 80% of cases, LBP due to adult spinal deformities (ASDs), including scoliosis, remains a major concern. Several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-notably the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22), and Core Outcome Measure Instrument (COMI)-are recommended for assessment in these populations. This study aims to verify if these PROMs can effectively distinguish between adults with scoliosis-associated LBP (SLBP) and those with non-specific LBP (LBP).
methodssubjects were categorised as either having idiopathic/degenerative scoliosis (>10° Cobb angle in the coronal plane) with LBP, or non-specific LBP. Statistical comparisons applied non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon rank-sum, Mood's median, chi-square), Spearman's correlation, and generalised linear regression analyses.
resultsAmong 1092 subjects (552 SLBP; 540 LBP), median ODI scores were similar between groups, while SRS-22 scores were modestly higher in the SLBP cohort. Females consistently reported higher ODI and lower SRS-22 scores. Significant correlations arose between ODI and COMI, with moderate inverse associations with SRS-22. Regression analysis demonstrated that pathology group, gender, age, and BMI weakly predicted PROM scores.
conclusionsODI and SRS-22 perform comparably in assessing disability in adults with LBP regardless of scoliosis, suggesting they cannot discriminate different pathologies. These findings underscore the importance of employing multiple PROMs to capture clinical dimensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.