Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41464141›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

When CBCT Looks Borderline and Standard Radiology Is Inconclusive: Should We Plate or Should We Wait?

Ömer Uranbey, Ece Gülbağ, Büşra Ekinci, Angela Rosa Caso, Jan Nienartowicz, Krzysztof Żak, Kamil Nelke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ömer UranbeyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın 09100, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0628-2419
Ece GülbağDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın 09100, Türkiye.
Büşra EkinciDepartment of Medical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın 09100, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1031-6853
Angela Rosa CasoDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Siena, Viale Aldo Moro, 2, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Jan NienartowiczDepartment of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Medical University, 40-027 Wrocław, Poland.
Krzysztof ŻakAcademy of Applied Sciences, Health Department, Academy of Silesius in Wałbrzych, Zamkowa 4 Street, 58-300 Wałbrzych, Poland.
Kamil NelkeAcademy of Applied Sciences, Health Department, Academy of Silesius in Wałbrzych, Zamkowa 4 Street, 58-300 Wałbrzych, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-0798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main role of panoramic radiography lies in its rapid screening capability and its ability to detect and identify bone lesions, pathologies, and tooth-bearing structures. Since panoramic radiographs are widely used, they provide a good view of the jaw bones, maxillary sinus, and temporomandibular area. However, their major limitation is the reduced ability to accurately assess bone conditions, particularly in evaluating cortical integrity or identifying subtle, nondisplaced, or greenstick-type fracture lines. Other limitations include the presence of artifacts, image distortion, magnification variability, and high sensitivity to patient and film positioning, all of which can compromise image quality and diagnostic confidence. This 2D imaging method is still used worldwide, especially by dentists; however, this type of radiograph can be unpredictable due to structural superimposition and reduced ability to clearly establish, measure, and verify the precise dimensions, boundaries, and areas occupied by selected lesions. Many patients undergo panoramic imaging to assess possible mandibular fractures after trauma or following the removal of cysts, tumors, or impacted teeth. In most cases, the occurrence of a fracture without displacement can be misjudged, omitted, or underestimated. In such cases, either cone-beam computed tomography is performed or a detailed clinical examination before or during surgery, followed by intraoperative assessment, helps identify a possible fracture line, bone bending, mandibular instability, or the potential need for simultaneous prophylactic plating during dental procedures or the use of maxillomandibular fixation. This paper presents the author's own experience regarding the limitations of panoramic radiographs in estimating bone condition and detecting fracture lines. Therefore, it is essential to highlight the role of prophylactic (preventive) mandibular plating (PMP) or fixation and to clarify when it should be considered.

Indexed as

bone healingmandibular fracturemaxillo-mandibular fixationosteosynthesisprophylactic plating

Identifiers

PMID41464141
PMCPMC12731337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.