ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
When CBCT Looks Borderline and Standard Radiology Is Inconclusive: Should We Plate or Should We Wait?
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of an AI-based segmentation model for mandibular fracture segmentation on CBCT using volumetric and 2D slice-based validation approaches.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Imaging-Guided Surgical Decision-Making and Bone Healing in Mandibular Cystic and Tumor-like Lesions: A Case-Based Radiologic Observation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main role of panoramic radiography lies in its rapid screening capability and its ability to detect and identify bone lesions, pathologies, and tooth-bearing structures. Since panoramic radiographs are widely used, they provide a good view of the jaw bones, maxillary sinus, and temporomandibular area. However, their major limitation is the reduced ability to accurately assess bone conditions, particularly in evaluating cortical integrity or identifying subtle, nondisplaced, or greenstick-type fracture lines. Other limitations include the presence of artifacts, image distortion, magnification variability, and high sensitivity to patient and film positioning, all of which can compromise image quality and diagnostic confidence. This 2D imaging method is still used worldwide, especially by dentists; however, this type of radiograph can be unpredictable due to structural superimposition and reduced ability to clearly establish, measure, and verify the precise dimensions, boundaries, and areas occupied by selected lesions. Many patients undergo panoramic imaging to assess possible mandibular fractures after trauma or following the removal of cysts, tumors, or impacted teeth. In most cases, the occurrence of a fracture without displacement can be misjudged, omitted, or underestimated. In such cases, either cone-beam computed tomography is performed or a detailed clinical examination before or during surgery, followed by intraoperative assessment, helps identify a possible fracture line, bone bending, mandibular instability, or the potential need for simultaneous prophylactic plating during dental procedures or the use of maxillomandibular fixation. This paper presents the author's own experience regarding the limitations of panoramic radiographs in estimating bone condition and detecting fracture lines. Therefore, it is essential to highlight the role of prophylactic (preventive) mandibular plating (PMP) or fixation and to clarify when it should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.