ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Supporting Self-Direction in Social and Daily Life Contexts Among Vulnerable Older Adults: A Protocol for an Integrative Review and Concept Analysis.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to provide conceptual clarity on self-direction support in the care of vulnerable older adults, particularly those with dementia. It focuses on how self-direction is supported in meaningful daily activities and social participation. The goal is to define and operationalize the concept by identifying its key attributes, antecedents, and consequences across care contexts.
methodsA two-phase approach will be used. First, an integrative review will synthesize empirical evidence from gerontology, occupational therapy, psychology, nursing, and health ethics to examine current conceptualizations and practices. Second, a concept analysis will explore the theoretical structure of self-direction support. Findings will be synthesized into a conceptual framework. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: This study is expected to provide a clearer conceptual framework outlining the core components of self-direction as described in existing literature. This framework will define key attributes, identify influencing factors, and propose measurable indicators. The framework aims to guide professionals in balancing autonomy, safety, and care needs.
conclusionsAs this is a study protocol, no results are presented; findings will be reported in the forthcoming review. The anticipated outcomes are expected to contribute to theory and practice by framing self-direction within social health. The framework may inform future research, policy, and intervention development to strengthen self-direction in meaningful activities and participation among vulnerable older adults. Further validation across settings and cultural contexts will be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.