Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41464060›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Face Value: Beauty, Punishment, and the Moral Politics of Appearance.

Franziska Hartung, Maxime Levasseur, Ewan J Lomax, Gareth Richards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franziska HartungSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4DR, UK.
Maxime LevasseurSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4DR, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-9028-463X
Ewan J LomaxSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4DR, UK.
Gareth RichardsSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4DR, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faces are central to human interaction, serving as primary sources of identity, emotional cues, and social judgments. Facial attractiveness is strongly linked to perceptions of trustworthiness and moral goodness, leading to preferential treatment across education, employment, and legal contexts. Deviations from facial norms-such as asymmetry or visible differences-are, by contrast, often associated with negative traits, social avoidance, and dehumanisation. Across cultures and centuries, deliberate facial disfiguration has been used as a form of punishment for perceived moral or legal transgressions. Evidence from ancient Egypt, Mediaeval Europe, and early modern legislation, as well as modern acid attacks, indicates that intentional facial disfiguration has long served as a means of ongoing punishment through humiliation and identity disruption. Motivations for targeting the face may be rooted in its central role in identity, beauty, symmetry, and symbolic purity. Despite contemporary legal efforts to curb acid attacks and related violence, legislation specifically addressing intentional facial disfiguration remains limited. Modern psychological research confirms that acquiring a facial difference can severely impact quality of life, social functioning, and identity. This paper synthesises historical, cultural, and psychological perspectives on punitive facial disfiguration, highlighting its enduring role as a mechanism of social control. Future research should examine perpetrators' decision-making, possible differences between different types of facial disfiguration, and the perceptual and emotional consequences of different facial injuries to inform prevention strategies and improve support for victims.

Indexed as

acid attacksdisfigurationfacial attractivenessfacial differencefacial disfigurementpunishmentpunitive mutilationsocial stigmavisible difference

Identifiers

PMID41464060
PMCPMC12729674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.