ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Development and Psychometric Properties of a Doctoral Student Agency Scale.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Doctoral student agency is increasingly regarded as a key construct in doctoral education. Yet, existing research on this topic focuses on qualitative approaches, and there remains a lack of psychometrically validated instruments, particularly in the Chinese context, where supervisory authority and institutional structures strongly shape student experiences. This study aimed to develop and validate the Doctoral Student Agency Scale (DSAS) to provide a comprehensive measure of doctoral students' agency during the process of professional socialization. A sequential mixed-methods design was adopted. First, a conceptual model was inductively constructed from semi-structured interviews with 27 doctoral students, followed by three-level qualitative coding to generate an initial pool of items. These were refined through expert review, and 436 valid responses were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The final DSAS consists of 27 items organized into 7 first-order factors, which load onto 3 second-order dimensions: self-agency, academic agency, and resource agency. Moreover, DSAS scores significantly correlated with academic ability and research role identity, two critical outcomes of doctoral student professional socialization, thus confirming the criterion validity. These findings indicate that the DSAS is a valid and reliable instrument. Theoretically, it contributes to refining the multidimensional conceptualization of doctoral agency, while practically, it provides supervisors and institutions with a diagnostic tool to design targeted interventions and foster doctoral development in context-sensitive ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.