ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
LegalEye: Multimodal Court Deception Detection Across Multiple Languages.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces LegalEye, a multimodal machine-learning model developed to detect deception in courtroom settings across three languages: English, Spanish, and Tagalog. The research investigates whether integrating audio, visual, and textual data can enhance deception detection accuracy and reduce bias in diverse legal contexts. LegalEye uses neural networks and late fusion techniques to analyze multimodal courtroom testimony data. The dataset was carefully constructed with balanced representation across racial groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian) and genders, with attention to minimizing implicit bias. Performance was evaluated using accuracy and AUC across individual and combined modalities. The model achieved high deception detection rates-97% for English, 85% for Spanish, and 86% for Tagalog. Late fusion of modalities outperformed single-modality models, with visual features being most influential for English and Tagalog, while Spanish showed stronger audio and textual performance. The Tagalog audio model underperformed due to frequent code-switching. Dataset balancing helped mitigate demographic bias, though Asian representation remained limited. LegalEye shows strong potential for language-adaptive and culturally sensitive deception detection, offering a robust tool for pre-trial interviews and legal analysis. While not suited for real-time courtroom decisions, its objective insights can support legal counsel and promote fairer judicial outcomes. Future work should expand linguistic and demographic coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.