Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41464046›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Impact of Flow on University EFL Learners' Psychological Capital: Insights from Positive Psychology.

Fan Jia, Xihong Wang, Chunjie Ding, Shujun Wang, Xiaorong Wang, Yanhui Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fan JiaSchool of Foreign Language, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2225-9561
Xihong WangInstitute of Applied Psychology, Psychological Research and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Chunjie DingInstitute of Applied Psychology, Psychological Research and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.ORCID 0009-0003-4411-1247
Shujun WangInstitute of Applied Psychology, Psychological Research and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Xiaorong WangInstitute of Applied Psychology, Psychological Research and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Yanhui MaoInstitute of Applied Psychology, Psychological Research and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province Nos: 24NSFSC1389The National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos: 72271205 and 71801180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have shown that flow, psychological capital (PsyCap), anxiety, and academic efficacy play significant roles in EFL learning, yet little attention has been paid to how these positive and negative states jointly shape learners' PsyCap. Grounded in the broaden-and-build theory, this study investigated how flow, a state of deep engagement and enjoyment in learning, affected EFL learners' PsyCap. A total of 1611 EFL learners at the CEFR B1-B2 levels from six universities in China participated in the study. Data were collected using validated questionnaires developed for this study that measured flow, foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), academic efficacy, and PsyCap, and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) in AMOS. The results revealed that flow had a significant direct positive effect on PsyCap (

Indexed as

academic efficacyflowforeign language classroom anxietypsychological capital

Identifiers

PMID41464046
PMCPMC12729530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.