Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41464028›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Looking into the Calculating Mind: Evidence About Arithmetic from Eye-Tracking Studies.

Elisabeth Goettfried, Laura Zamarian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elisabeth GoettfriedDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0009-0004-6969-1230
Laura ZamarianDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1640-4179

Funding

Euregio Tyrol-South Tyrol-Trentino 4th Euregio Science Fund callFWF Austrian Science Fund IPN 135-B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The investigation of eye movements has been shown to provide valuable insights into a variety of cognitive processes. A limited number of recent studies have adopted eye-tracking to investigate the processes underlying simple and complex arithmetic. Here, we review and discuss these studies. We identify two lines of research: While some studies have focused on the spatial-arithmetic associations emerging during arithmetic problem solving, some others have examined the use of procedures, strategies, and rules. Generally, results point to the added value of eye-tracking as a method for investigating different underlying processes during mental arithmetic. Altogether, eye-tracking does not only confirm the evidence gained from "pure" behavioral studies, but it also gives new insights, in particular with regard to temporal dynamics, problem difficulty, use of strategies, and inter-individual differences. Such an approach holds great potential for the studying of arithmetic not only in healthy individuals but also in clinical populations.

Indexed as

arithmeticeye-trackingproceduresspatial attentionstrategies

Identifiers

PMID41464028
PMCPMC12729500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.