ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Relationship Between Career Adaptability and Work Engagement Among Young Chinese Workers: Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction and Moderating Effects of Artificial Intelligence Self-Efficacy and Anxiety.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How and when does artificial intelligence use enhance student creativity? The mediating role of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the complex psychological mechanisms linking career adaptability to work engagement under AI-driven workplaces. We examine the mediating role of job satisfaction and investigate a key hypothesis: that the adaptive benefits of AI self-efficacy are dampened by the emotional costs associated with AI anxiety. A dual-analytical approach was employed on a sample of 311 young Chinese workers. First, we conducted conditional process analysis using PROCESS Model 11 with 5000 bootstrapped samples to test for conditional indirect effects. Second, we utilized latent variable structural equation modeling for robust validation at the structural level. Analyses were adjusted for demographic and occupational covariates. As a result, the initial PROCESS analysis revealed that the key triple interaction (career adaptability × AI self-efficacy × AI anxiety) was statistically significant in all three test models (e.g., Model 1:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.