ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Learning Through Simulation: Counselor Trainees' Interactions with ChatGPT as a Client.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Psychological Counseling: A Narrative Review and Governance Framework.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored in counselor education, yet its pedagogical implications remain underexamined. This study investigated counselor trainees' experiences using ChatGPT (GPT-4o) as a simulated client for role-play practice, aiming to assess its potential benefits and limitations as a supplemental training tool. Using qualitative content analysis, AI-simulated counseling session transcripts were coded based on dimensions such as authenticity, emotional expression, consistency, self-awareness, and cultural dynamics. Additionally, a focus group interview provided insights into trainees' perceptions. Findings indicate that AI simulations offered a psychologically safe, flexible environment for practicing counseling skills, reducing performance anxiety, and fostering confidence before working with real clients. Participants emphasized the importance of detailed prompts to enhance realism and complexity, while noting limitations such as overly agreeable responses, lack of emotional nuance, and cultural neutrality unless explicitly prompted. Overall, trainees viewed AI as a valuable supplement rather than a replacement for live practice. These results suggest that generative AI can enhance experiential learning when integrated thoughtfully with structured guidance, ethical oversight, and culturally responsive design. Future research should explore strategies to improve authenticity and emotional depth in AI simulations to better support counselor competency development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.