ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quantity-Sourced or Quality-Sourced? The Impact of Word-of-Mouth Recommendations on China Rural Residents' Online Purchase Intention: The Chain Mediating Roles of Social Distance and Perceived Value.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines how different types of word-of-mouth (WOM) influence online purchase intention (OPI) among rural residents, an area not yet fully explored. Based on social tie strength theory, we classify WOM into "quantity-sourced" (e.g., friends, family, general consumers) and "quality-sourced" (e.g., influencers, celebrities, professionals). We propose a chain mediation model involving social distance (SD) and perceived value (PV). Using survey data from 1005 rural residents in Jiangxi Province, China, and analyzing the data with structural equation modeling (SmartPLS 4), we find that quantity-sourced WOM positively affects OPI (β = 0.135), while quality-sourced WOM negatively affects it (β = -0.166). Mechanism analysis shows SD is a key mediator: quantity-sourced WOM shortens SD, thereby increasing OPI (β = 0.152), whereas quality-sourced WOM widens SD, reducing OPI (β = -0.047). PV mediates between quantity-sourced WOM and OPI (β = 0.043), but it shows no significant mediation between quality-sourced WOM and OPI (β = -0.002). Additionally, SD and PV serve as chain mediators between both types of WOM and OPI. These findings extend WOM theory to rural contexts and offer practical insights for governments and e-commerce platforms to develop differentiated WOM strategies and build localized WOM networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.