Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463978›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Knowledge Sharing in AI-Enabled Workplaces: A Social Cognitive Perspective on Usefulness Perceptions and Competition.

Chuling Zhong, Yao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chuling ZhongSchool of Business, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China.
Yao WangSchool of Business, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China.ORCID 0009-0002-7783-6028

Funding

Scientific Research and Innovation Program of China University of Political Science and Law 25KYQN002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into organizational processes brings both opportunities and challenges for knowledge sharing. Knowledge sharing remains a cornerstone of organizational learning and innovation, yet the emergence of AI introduces new complexities to this behavior. In particular, AI-related knowledge is both a valuable tool and a controversial technology, whose dual nature generates uncertainty in employees' evaluations and decisions about sharing it. Drawing on social cognitive theory (SCT), this study develops a moderated mediation model to explain how personal cognitions and environmental cues jointly shape AI-related knowledge sharing. Within the SCT framework, perceived AI usefulness represents a personal cognitive evaluation, whereas anticipated positive response reflects a social outcome expectation. When employees perceive AI as highly useful, they are more likely to expect positive social feedback, which in turn motivates AI-related knowledge sharing behavior. Moreover, organizational competitive climate weakens this effect by acting as a social discount factor that reduces the perceived significance of social rewards. A three-wave survey of 519 Chinese employees supports these hypotheses, extending SCT by revealing how the dual nature of AI shapes employee outcome expectations and by identifying a socially grounded cognitive pathway that links perceived AI usefulness to knowledge sharing behaviors in organizational contexts.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigital transformationknowledge sharingorganizational climatesocial cognitive theory

Identifiers

PMID41463978
PMCPMC12729641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.