Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463974›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Beyond the Surface: A Consensual Qualitative Research into the Multifaceted Nature of Bullying.

Laura Menabò, Debora Ginocchio, Felicia Roga, Eleonora Renda, Annalisa Guarini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura MenabòDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Viale Carlo Berti Pichat, 5, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1293-2898
Debora GinocchioFaculty of Law, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via San Geminiano, 3, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1747-8508
Felicia RogaDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Viale Carlo Berti Pichat, 5, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Eleonora RendaDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Viale Carlo Berti Pichat, 5, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Annalisa GuariniDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Viale Carlo Berti Pichat, 5, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3739-2162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bullying is a significant social issue, yet research often relies on quantitative methods. Our study aimed to gain a deeper insight by giving students a voice in expressing their experiences and perceptions, focusing on how youth define and perceive bullying, the different roles involved, and the coping strategies they identify. We conducted 16 focus groups with 220 Italian students, using the Consensus Qualitative Research method. Seven key domains emerged, with core ideas classified by frequency: general (>75%), typical (25-75%), and variant (≤25%). In "Characteristics of bullying," power imbalance was general, intentionality was typical, and repetition was variant. In "Bullying behaviors," physical and verbal bullying were general; relational bullying was variant. Regarding "The bully," moral disengagement and compensation were general, retaliation was typical, and intimidation was variant. For "The victim," perceived weakness and well-being were general, ethnic victimization was typical, and victim blaming was variant. In "Other roles," pro-bullies and passive bystanders were typical; defenders were variant. "Victim's coping strategies" included nonchalance, distancing, and seeking social support as general; retaliation as typical; and talking with the bully as variant. Finally, "Bystanders' coping strategies" included protecting the victim (typical) and self-protection (variant). These findings offer a nuanced perspective on bullying and inform more targeted interventions.

Indexed as

bullyingcoping strategiesdefinitionfocus groupqualitative researchroles

Identifiers

PMID41463974
PMCPMC12729306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.