Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463953›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Role of Dispositional Rule-Following and Metaphors About Psychological Flexibility on Operant Schedule Control.

Grace A Lyons, Robert D Zettle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grace A LyonsDepartment of Psychology, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260, USA.
Robert D ZettleDepartment of Psychology, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-5780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metaphors are used throughout acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) to minimize the inflexibility of rule-governed, rather than contingency-shaped, behavior. Within the behavior analytic literature underlying ACT, responding on operant schedules has been used to parse out these differing sources of behavioral control. We thus used this preparation to more directly link the therapeutic use of metaphors to this literature. Participants were 105 undergraduates presented one of three passages-two metaphors and one nonmetaphor-with varying relevance for schedule control on an operant task where points could be both gained and lost. Schedule control was analyzed by visual analysis of cumulative point records over the course of the task. Two measures of dispositional rule-following-tracking and pliance-were also examined as moderators. No differences in schedule control were found between passage conditions alone. However, participants high in tracking who received the task-relevant metaphor were most likely to demonstrate schedule control reflective of psychological flexibility, while those low in both tracking and pliance who received the task-relevant metaphor were least likely to do so. Findings suggest dispositional tracking heightens the impact of therapeutic metaphors on psychological flexibility. Limitations and implications for further research on the behavior analysis of therapeutic metaphors are discussed.

Indexed as

metaphorspliancepsychological flexibilityschedule controltracking

Identifiers

PMID41463953
PMCPMC12729291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.