Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463945›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Digital Detection of Suicidal Ideation: A Scoping Review to Inform Prevention and Psychological Well-Being.

Benedetta Trentarossi, Mateus Eduardo Romão, Serena Barello, Makilim Nunes Baptista, Silvia Damiana Visonà, Giacomo Belli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benedetta TrentarossiDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-4128-7325
Mateus Eduardo RomãoWHYpsy Lab, Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-8968-1616
Serena BarelloWHYpsy Lab, Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8514-2563
Makilim Nunes BaptistaDepartment of Psychology at Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13034-685, Brazil.
Silvia Damiana VisonàDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Giacomo BelliDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide is a major global public health concern, especially among young people. Given that digital surroundings are progressively influencing communication patterns, young people frequently communicate their feelings online, including suicidal thoughts. By promptly drawing attention to these posts, a crucial preventive measure could be taken. A scoping review guided by the research question "What is the current state of the art in detecting suicidal ideation in online posts?" following PRISMA guidelines. Out of the 1584 articles identified, only 48 met the inclusion criteria. The majority of articles were related to posts written in English on Reddit and Twitter. The main aim of the studies were interpretative (aim to explore how suicidal ideation is expressed in online environments) or predictive (aim to identify posts that may indicate suicidal ideation) and most of the posts were analyzed using artificial intelligence rather than traditional methods. Some, however, used mixed methods. Despite the potential of AI for rapidly processing and annotating suicidal notes, several hurdles remain, especially ethically obtained data sets and limited cross-cultural portability of models. Furthermore, current AI systems fail to interpret metaphors, irony, or context-specific meaning underscoring the requirement for hybrid models combining machine speed with human judgment.

Indexed as

digital suicideonlinescoping reviewsuicidal ideationsuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID41463945
PMCPMC12730052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.