Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463918›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

CFD Application to Poultry Crate Design Improving Internal Airflow Velocities.

Victor Abreu de Lima, Jasson Fernandez Gurgel, Daniel Gurgel Pinheiro, Nítalo André Farias Machado, José Antonio Delfino Barbosa Filho, Antonio Velarde, Iran José Oliveira da Silva, Marcos Vinícius da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Victor Abreu de LimaDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60450-760, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-9444-8139
Jasson Fernandez GurgelDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60450-760, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2439-2750
Daniel Gurgel PinheiroDepartment of Industry, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Ceará, Fortaleza 60410-426, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9046-4199
Nítalo André Farias MachadoChapadinha Science Center, Federal University of Maranhão, Chapadinha 65500-000, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4967-2620
José Antonio Delfino Barbosa FilhoDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60450-760, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9328-2021
Antonio VelardeIRTA, Animal Welfare, Veïnat de Sies, 17121, Monells, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2634-3138
Iran José Oliveira da SilvaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, University of São Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4416-8433
Marcos Vinícius da SilvaChapadinha Science Center, Federal University of Maranhão, Chapadinha 65500-000, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1318-2320

Funding

CNPq 442480/2023-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry transport represents a significant animal welfare challenge, particularly when birds are exposed to heat stress during travel, a condition that can compromise physiological stability, performance, and survival. Despite the relevance of this issue, research on engineering improvements to poultry transport crates remains limited. In this study, four virtual models of poultry transport crates were evaluated to assess their potential to improve the thermal comfort internal airflow conditions. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were conducted under three transport speeds, complemented by wind tunnel experiments using reduced-scale prototypes fabricated by additive manufacturing. The results demonstrated that the alternative crate 3 (AC3) model presented exhibited superior internal average airflow velocities (IAFV) across all speeds, including a 32.85% increase compared to the conventional crate at 60 km/h. Wind tunnel testing confirmed significant differences among crate designs. AC3 showed lower air temperature than AC1 and reduced relative humidity compared to CC and AC2. Thermal comfort indices supported these findings, with AC3 presenting the lowest THI and enthalpy, indicating a less stressful microclimate. In terms of airflow, AC2 and AC3 achieved higher IAFV (19.27 ± 8.49 m/s and 19.30 ± 4.80 m/s) than CC and AC1. AC3 also had the lowest dynamic pressure, suggesting reduced airflow resistance and more efficient aerodynamics. Therefore, improved crate geometry and increased ventilation surface can enhance airflow distribution, potentially reduce heat accumulation and improve animal welfare. However, further studies involving live birds, realistic stocking densities, and full-scale trailer simulations are required to validate these benefits under commercial transport conditions.

Indexed as

animal welfarecontainerlive transportpoultrythermal stress

Identifiers

PMID41463918
PMCPMC12730058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.