ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Performance Comparison of Argos and Iridium Tracking Technologies for Sea Turtle Movement Ecology Studies.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Satellite tracking has dramatically improved research on wide-ranging large marine vertebrates such as sea turtles. Traditionally, sea turtle tracking has relied on Argos-based satellite telemetry tags, which estimate location via Doppler shift and can also transmit sensor data. GPS-equipped Argos satellite tags represented a significant evolution, offering higher location accuracy. More recently, GPS-equipped satellite tags transmitting via the Iridium satellite network have become available for sea turtle tracking, and this study aims to assess whether they offer additional advantages. The performance of three satellite tag types-Argos-only, Argos-GPS, and Iridium-GPS (Iridium)-was assessed using data on 116,074 positions from 48 sea turtles representing five species and multiple ocean basins. Performance was evaluated using three indicators: the proportion of days with location data, the duration of gaps between locations, and the number of positions per day. Bayesian generalized linear mixed models assessed the effect of satellite tag type, technical settings, species, and activity (migration, foraging, internesting). Results indicate that Iridium satellite tags generally perform similarly to both Argos-based satellite tags, but performance improves significantly when programmed with high-frequency GPS acquisition (>24 positions/day), a result made possible by their tenfold higher transmission capacity compared to Argos. This capacity also enables transmission of more sensor data. Performance, however, varied by species and activity. These findings highlight the potential of Iridium tags to enhance fine-scale movement studies by improving the spatial and temporal resolution of sea turtle tracking, with important implications for ecological research and conservation planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.