Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463892›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Performance Comparison of Argos and Iridium Tracking Technologies for Sea Turtle Movement Ecology Studies.

Paolo Casale, Christine Figgener, Michael Arendt, Annette C Broderick, Simona A Ceriani, Yakup Kaska, Pamela Plotkin, Cheryl L Sanchez, Jeffrey Schwenter, Robin Snape and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Paolo CasaleDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Via A. Volta 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2534-6158
Christine FiggenerNamaka Conservation Science, 70402 Gandoca, Talamanca, Sixaola, Limón, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-8321-229X
Michael ArendtDepartment of Natural Resources, Marine Resources Division, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.
Annette C BroderickCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Truro TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1444-1782
Simona A CerianiFish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4798-4786
Yakup KaskaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Pamukkale, Pamukkale, Denizli 20070, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5169-8216
Pamela PlotkinDepartment of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3973-8988
Cheryl L SanchezFish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.
Jeffrey SchwenterDepartment of Natural Resources, Marine Resources Division, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.
Robin SnapeSociety for the Protection of Turtles (SPOT), Barbaros sok (23/2), Gönyeli, 99150 Nicosia, North Cyprus.
Doğan SözbilenDepartment of Veterinary, Acıpayam Vocational School, Pamukkale University, Denizli 20070, Türkiye.
Natalie E WildermannMarine Science Program, Division of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0317-6832
Paolo LuschiDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Via A. Volta 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7081-3507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Satellite tracking has dramatically improved research on wide-ranging large marine vertebrates such as sea turtles. Traditionally, sea turtle tracking has relied on Argos-based satellite telemetry tags, which estimate location via Doppler shift and can also transmit sensor data. GPS-equipped Argos satellite tags represented a significant evolution, offering higher location accuracy. More recently, GPS-equipped satellite tags transmitting via the Iridium satellite network have become available for sea turtle tracking, and this study aims to assess whether they offer additional advantages. The performance of three satellite tag types-Argos-only, Argos-GPS, and Iridium-GPS (Iridium)-was assessed using data on 116,074 positions from 48 sea turtles representing five species and multiple ocean basins. Performance was evaluated using three indicators: the proportion of days with location data, the duration of gaps between locations, and the number of positions per day. Bayesian generalized linear mixed models assessed the effect of satellite tag type, technical settings, species, and activity (migration, foraging, internesting). Results indicate that Iridium satellite tags generally perform similarly to both Argos-based satellite tags, but performance improves significantly when programmed with high-frequency GPS acquisition (>24 positions/day), a result made possible by their tenfold higher transmission capacity compared to Argos. This capacity also enables transmission of more sensor data. Performance, however, varied by species and activity. These findings highlight the potential of Iridium tags to enhance fine-scale movement studies by improving the spatial and temporal resolution of sea turtle tracking, with important implications for ecological research and conservation planning.

Indexed as

animal-borne sensorsBayesian modellingGPSmarine megafaunasatellite telemetryspatiotemporal resolution

Identifiers

PMID41463892
PMCPMC12729580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.