ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
A Note on Some Health-Related Outcomes in Small Ruminant Farms with Common Grazing with Wildlife Ruminants.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Small Ruminant Farms as Managed Ecosystems: A Conceptual Framework for Components and Interactions, and the Role of Health Management.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The specific objective of the current paper was the description of some health-related outcomes in sheep and goat farms in Greece with common grazing with wildlife ruminants. Faecal samples were collected and information regarding health management applied on farms was obtained from sheep and goat farms located throughout Greece (325 and 119 farms, respectively). Common grazing of livestock (sheep, goats) with wildlife ruminants (roe deer, red deer) was reported in 9.2% of farms. Faecal epg counts in farms with common grazing with wildlife ruminants were higher than in farms with no common grazing: respective median values were 270 epg versus 150 epg; also, there was a tendency for faecal counts >300 epg to be recorded more frequently among the former farms (36.1% versus 23.1% of farms). Median annual incidence of cases of abortion and of cases of diarrhoea in lambs/kids was significantly higher in farms with common grazing with wildlife ruminants: 1.7% and 9.0%, respectively, versus 0.0% and 1.7%, respectively, in farms with no common grazing. The findings have revealed associations of common grazing with wildlife ruminants with the health of sheep and goats. These can have implications in the health management of farms, for example, in the administration of anthelmintic treatments and in the development of vaccination programmes in livestock farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.