ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Hydroponic Forage in Ruminant Nutrition: A Systematic Review of Nutritional Value, Performance Outcomes, and Sustainability.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluated 28 peer-reviewed studies on the use of hydroponic forage in ruminant diets, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Hydroponic barley sprouts contain on average 14.8 ± 2.1% CP, 3.6 ± 0.4% EE, 12.9 ± 1.7% NDF, 7.8 ± 1.2% ADF, and 10.5 ± 2.8% DM (mean ± SD; n = 21 studies), and mineral content, though limited by high moisture and low dry matter yield. Among the included studies, 61% focused on barley, confirming its suitability for hydroponic cultivation. In dairy cattle, hydroponic forage improved milk fat content and oleic acid (C18:1), linoleic acid (C18:2), and α-linolenic acid (C18:3) and reduced saturated fatty acids without compromising yield. In buffaloes, inclusion enhanced cheese quality and reduced energy footprint, though costs were higher. For small ruminants and growing animals, moderate inclusion (5-25% dry matter) improved intake, digestibility, and growth, while excessive replacement reduced feed intake or digestibility, likely due to rumen microbiota shifts. Additionally, hydroponic feeding reduced methane emissions in lambs, highlighting its environmental potential. Overall, hydroponic forage can serve as a sustainable complement to conventional feed resources, promoting resource efficiency and animal performance when properly integrated into balanced diets. Further studies should define optimal inclusion rates and evaluate economic and environmental trade-offs under different production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.