ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Treatment and Prevention of Cardiogenic Arterial Thromboembolism in the Cat: A Systematic Review.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feline cardiogenic arterial thromboembolism (ATE) is a severe complication of cardiac disease in cats, often causing severe clinical signs and poor prognosis. Despite its importance, standardized guidelines for prevention and treatment are lacking. This systematic review evaluated available evidence on preventive, acute, and chronic management strategies for feline cardiogenic ATE. A comprehensive search using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was performed, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies investigating therapeutic interventions for ATE were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool. Nineteen studies involving 909 cats were included. Preventive therapy with clopidogrel and rivaroxaban improved survival. Acute multimodal treatment combining anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs improved survival compared to monotherapy. Thrombolytic therapy showed some efficacy but had frequent severe complications. Long-term management with clopidogrel and rivaroxaban achieved the longest survival and lowest recurrence, while acetylsalicylic acid provided inconsistent benefits and more adverse effects. Eleven of the nineteen (58%) studies had high risk of bias due to small sample size and heterogeneous protocols. Current evidence supports dual therapy, particularly clopidogrel with rivaroxaban or enoxaparin, as the most effective and well-tolerated approach for prevention and treatment. Larger, standardized prospective trials are urgently needed to strengthen the evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.