Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463819›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

What Do We Know About Children's and Adolescents' Formal and Non-Formal Learning in the Zoo? A Systematic Literature Review.

Armin Baur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Armin BaurDepartment of Biology Education, Institute for Science and Technology Education, University of Education Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5950-7613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoos and aquariums are important learning environments for formal, non-formal and informal learning. A systematic theoretical basis for adult visitors' learning at zoos and aquariums already exists. In total, there have been six literature reviews of this topic. However, to date, no literature review has been published concerning children's and adolescents' learning in zoos and aquariums. The systematic literature review presented in this article fills this gap and summarises the published results on formal and non-formal learning by children and adolescents in zoos and aquariums. A literature search in the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Web of Science databases yielded 858 peer-reviewed articles. Fifty-one of these met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were analysed more deeply. Each step of the literature search was verified by a human interrater. The analysis of the studies included in the review followed the steps of qualitative content analysis. The coding of the studies was done by two raters to ensure objectivity and reliability. For these, a human rater and an artificial intelligence system analysed the studies. The results indicate differences in research focus in different countries and that zoos and aquariums are productive learning environments for various types of visiting (e.g., learning trips, family outings) with a variety of identified learning methods and elements (e.g., touch tanks, keeper talks, guided tours, camps) that have different positive effects on knowledge, attitudes, behaviour and other variables. However, the results also identify starting points for new research and research gaps in this area.

Indexed as

adolescentsaquariumchildrenlearningliterature reviewzoo

Identifiers

PMID41463819
PMCPMC12729533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.