Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463709›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Comprehensive Review of the Application of Bacteriophages Against Enteric Bacterial Infection in Poultry: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Prospects.

Muhammad Muneeb, Ehsaan Ullah Khan, Sohail Ahmad, Ijaz Hussain, Shumaila Batool, Arooj Fatima, Elham Assadi Soumeh, Ali R Al Sulaiman, Ala E Abudabos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad MuneebDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0005-8215-2677
Ehsaan Ullah KhanDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1062-4223
Sohail AhmadDepartment of Poultry Production, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0390-3083
Ijaz HussainDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Shumaila BatoolDepartment of Zoology, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0000-4949-4281
Arooj FatimaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0004-9842-1213
Elham Assadi SoumehSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8635-3138
Ali R Al SulaimanEnvironmental Protection Technologies Institute, Sustainability and Environment Sector, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, P.O. Box 6086, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4005-1569
Ala E AbudabosDepartment of Food and Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-0344

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poultry industry plays a major role in the emergence and spread of foodborne zoonotic diseases, particularly those associated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. These diseases pose substantial global public health challenges, and the increasing development of antimicrobial resistance further intensifies these concerns. In response, scientific efforts have expanded to develop and implement innovative technologies capable of mitigating the rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms. Therapeutic bacteriophage supplementation has regained significant attention because it can selectively lyse specific bacteria, is cost-effective to produce, offers environmentally favorable characteristics, and provides several advantages over conventional antibiotics. Experimental studies have demonstrated that phage therapy is both safe and effective for controlling poultry-associated enteric pathogens. Phages can be applied at various stages of the poultry production chain, from rearing to processing and distribution, using multiple delivery strategies. Despite certain limitations, the targeted and well-regulated application of phage cocktails offers considerable potential as an alternative to antibiotics for managing MDR infections. The success of bacteriophage therapy depends on several factors, including the timing of administration, dosage, delivery method, and its integration with other therapeutic approaches. Therefore, developing a comprehensive understanding of bacteriophage utilization in poultry production is both timely and necessary. This review examines the applications, constraints, and future opportunities of phage therapy within the commercial poultry industry, with particular emphasis on the mechanisms through which bacteriophages control bacterial infections.

Indexed as

antibiotic alternativebacteriophageenteric diseasephage therapypoultry

Identifiers

PMID41463709
PMCPMC12729848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.