ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Implementation of a Stress Biomarker and Development of a Deep Neural Network-Based Multi-Mental State Classification Model.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a model capable of predicting stress levels and interpreting the underlying physiological patterns using large-scale, real-life biosignal data. To achieve this, we utilized approximately 137,000 longitudinal measurements voluntarily collected from residents of Sejong Special Self-Governing City over a two-year period (February 2023-December 2024). Based on these data, we constructed a stress prediction framework that integrates both static machine-learning models-such as Random Forest and LightGBM-and time-series deep learning models, including LSTM and Transformer architectures. Model interpretability was further enhanced through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), which quantified the contribution of key biomarkers, and through visualization of Transformer attention weights to reveal temporal interactions within the biosignal sequences. The central objective of this study was to evaluate how accurately a deep learning model can learn and reproduce stress indices generated by existing heart rate variability (HRV)-based algorithms embedded in K-FDA-approved wearable devices. Accordingly, the ground truth used in this work reflects algorithmic outputs rather than clinically validated assessments such as salivary cortisol or psychological scales. Thus, rather than identifying independent clinical stress markers, the present work focuses on determining whether a Transformer-based model can effectively approximate device-derived physiological stress levels over time, thereby providing a methodological foundation for future applications using clinically validated stress labels. Experimental results demonstrated that the Transformer model achieved approximately 98% classification accuracy across this large dataset, indicating that it successfully captures short-term biosignal fluctuations as well as long-term temporal structure. These findings collectively demonstrate the engineering feasibility of developing a large-scale, wearable-based stress monitoring system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.