ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Review on Registration Techniques for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Ultrasound Images.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of medical imaging technology, the early diagnosis and treatment of heart disease have been significantly improved. Cardiac CT (Computed Tomography) and ultrasound images are often used in combination to provide more comprehensive information on cardiac structure and function due to their respective advantages and limitations. However, due to the significant differences in imaging principles, resolutions, and viewing angles between these two imaging modalities, how to effectively register cardiac CT and ultrasound images has become an important research topic in imaging and clinical applications. This article summarizes the research progress of cardiac CT and ultrasound image registration, and analyzes the existing registration methods and their advantages and disadvantages. Firstly, this article summarizes traditional registration methods based on image intensity, feature points, and regions, and explores the application of rigid and non-rigid registration algorithms. Secondly, in view of common challenges in cardiac CT and ultrasound image registration, such as image noise, deformation, and differences in imaging time, this article discusses the recent advances in multimodal registration technology in cardiac imaging and forecasts the potential of deep learning methods in registration. In addition, this article also evaluates the application effects and limitations of these methods in clinical practice, and finally looks forward to the future development direction of cardiac image registration technology, especially its potential applications in personalized medicine and real-time monitoring. Through a comprehensive review of the current research status of cardiac CT and ultrasound image registration, this article provides a systematic theoretical framework for researchers in related fields and provides a reference for future technological breakthroughs and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.