ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Brief Review on the Analysis of dsDNA, RNA, Amino Acids and Bacteria by Capillary Electrophoresis.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is an effective tool for the analysis of many biocomponents, such as dsDNA, RNA, amino acids and bacteria, which are extremely important not only in research work but also in numerous practical applications. However, there are many factors that affect the separation performance, including the polymers inside the capillary, the electric field strength, the capillary coating and the effective length of the capillary. So far, various CE techniques have been developed to increase the resolution, sample volume consumption and limit of detection. To better understand the development of techniques for the separation of these biomolecules by CE, this review provides a comprehensive summary of polymers (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone, hydroxyethyl cellulose and polyethylene glycol), optimization methods, capillary coating methods, technological advancement of microchips for CE and the limitation of detection proposed by different groups worldwide. We also discuss the challenges and future directions associated with CE technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.