ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Role of MER Processing Pipelines for STN Functional Identification During DBS Surgery: A Feature-Based Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microelectrode recording (MER) is commonly used to validate preoperative targeting during subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's Disease (PD). Although machine learning (ML) has been used to improve STN localization using MER data, the impact of preprocessing steps on the accuracy of classifiers has received little attention. We evaluated 24 distinct preprocessing pipelines combining four artifact removal strategies, three outlier handling methods, and optional feature normalization. The effect of each data processing procedure's component of interest was evaluated in function of the performance obtained using three ML models. Artifact rejection methods (i.e., unsupervised variance-based algorithm (COV) and background noise estimation (BCK)), combined with optimized outlier management (i.e., statistical outlier identification per hemisphere (ORH)) consistently improved classification performance. In contrast, applying hemisphere-specific feature normalization prior to classification led to performance degradation across all metrics. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis, performed to determine feature importance across pipelines, revealed stable agreement with regard to influential features across diverse preprocessing configurations. In conclusion, optimal artifact rejection and outlier treatment are essential in preprocessing MER for STN identification in DBS, whereas preliminary feature normalization strategies may impair model performance. Overall, the best classification performance was obtained by applying the Random Forest model to the dataset treated using COV artifact rejection and ORH outlier management (accuracy = 0.945). SHAP-based interpretability offers valuable guidance for refining ML pipelines. These insights can inform robust protocol development for MER-guided DBS targeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.