ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Decellularization Protocols for Esophagus Bioengineering: A Systematic Review.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous protocols exist concerning the decellularization of the esophagus, a potential alternative to the classical surgical approach for the reconstruction of the digestive tract after esophagectomy. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to provide an overview of the effectiveness of the current protocols.
methodsThis SLR was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus until September 2025. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria.
resultsA total of 2494 references were screened after removing duplicates. Among these references, 26 articles were included. The large majority of studies (24/26) used Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) or Sodium DeoxyCholate (SDC), and the most common physical method was the cannulation of the esophagus (17/26). The animal model was very heterogenous. All protocols except one showed no residual cell nuclei, with only 5/19 papers confirming a satisfactory residual amount of DNA. The assessment of the extracellular matrix (ECM)-mostly qualitative-revealed global preservation but with a systematic loss of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs).
conclusionsThe decellularization of the esophagus is feasible, but the definition of the optimal protocol to achieve this goal remains difficult because of the important heterogeneity among the different studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.